The First Lady's Name Used in Cryptocurrency Scam: Who Benefits from the Double Standard?
In a stunning case of hypocrisy, Melania Trump's name has been cited alongside a cryptocurrency scam that bilked investors out of millions of dollars. The first lady's involvement with the scheme, allegedly used as "window dressing" to dupe buyers, has sparked outrage among lawmakers and raised questions about double standards in accountability.
A group of investors is suing two men, Benjamin Chow and Hayden Davis, who co-founded crypto-based companies that allegedly led a pump-and-dump scheme. The scheme, which allegedly inflated the value of numerous cryptocurrencies, including $MELANIA and $LIBRA, has left thousands of investors with significant losses. Melania Trump's name appears alongside her alleged "window dressing" role in the scam.
While the first lady is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, lawmakers have repeatedly called out President Donald Trump for his involvement in the cryptocurrency industry during his presidency. Congressional Democrats criticized Trump for using his family's business empire to profit from his presidency while shaping policy on the industry.
Melania Trump's promotion of $MELANIA, a meme coin that soon flopped, has been seen as particularly egregious. The cryptocurrency was endorsed by the first lady with a post on X around her husband's inauguration in January, which helped drive prices up to $12.95 per coin. While it is unclear what Melania Trump knew about the scheme or how much she profited from it, her involvement raises questions about the ethics of promoting a cryptocurrency from her position as first lady.
The double standard in accountability has sparked widespread criticism, particularly when compared to other former first ladies like Jill Biden and Michelle Obama. While they would likely face intense scrutiny if accused of similar wrongdoing, Melania Trump's name seems to be exempt from the same level of scrutiny.
The plaintiffs' request for permission to file an updated complaint highlights the lack of transparency and accountability in the cryptocurrency industry. The case serves as a reminder that even those in positions of power can be held accountable for their actions, and that the pursuit of profit should not come at the expense of ethics and integrity.
				
			In a stunning case of hypocrisy, Melania Trump's name has been cited alongside a cryptocurrency scam that bilked investors out of millions of dollars. The first lady's involvement with the scheme, allegedly used as "window dressing" to dupe buyers, has sparked outrage among lawmakers and raised questions about double standards in accountability.
A group of investors is suing two men, Benjamin Chow and Hayden Davis, who co-founded crypto-based companies that allegedly led a pump-and-dump scheme. The scheme, which allegedly inflated the value of numerous cryptocurrencies, including $MELANIA and $LIBRA, has left thousands of investors with significant losses. Melania Trump's name appears alongside her alleged "window dressing" role in the scam.
While the first lady is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, lawmakers have repeatedly called out President Donald Trump for his involvement in the cryptocurrency industry during his presidency. Congressional Democrats criticized Trump for using his family's business empire to profit from his presidency while shaping policy on the industry.
Melania Trump's promotion of $MELANIA, a meme coin that soon flopped, has been seen as particularly egregious. The cryptocurrency was endorsed by the first lady with a post on X around her husband's inauguration in January, which helped drive prices up to $12.95 per coin. While it is unclear what Melania Trump knew about the scheme or how much she profited from it, her involvement raises questions about the ethics of promoting a cryptocurrency from her position as first lady.
The double standard in accountability has sparked widespread criticism, particularly when compared to other former first ladies like Jill Biden and Michelle Obama. While they would likely face intense scrutiny if accused of similar wrongdoing, Melania Trump's name seems to be exempt from the same level of scrutiny.
The plaintiffs' request for permission to file an updated complaint highlights the lack of transparency and accountability in the cryptocurrency industry. The case serves as a reminder that even those in positions of power can be held accountable for their actions, and that the pursuit of profit should not come at the expense of ethics and integrity.
 ! Melania's name being used in some shady crypto scam is just another example of how our politicians are completely out of touch with reality
! Melania's name being used in some shady crypto scam is just another example of how our politicians are completely out of touch with reality  . It's like, can't we all just get along?
. It's like, can't we all just get along?  The fact that her involvement is being swept under the rug while her hubby gets roasted for his own questionable dealings is just so unfair
 The fact that her involvement is being swept under the rug while her hubby gets roasted for his own questionable dealings is just so unfair  . I mean, come on, if Jill and Michelle were in this situation, they'd be getting a serious public dressing down, no doubt about it
. I mean, come on, if Jill and Michelle were in this situation, they'd be getting a serious public dressing down, no doubt about it  . It's like we're living in some kind of bizarre parallel universe where ethics are optional
. It's like we're living in some kind of bizarre parallel universe where ethics are optional  . The whole thing is just so frustrating
. The whole thing is just so frustrating  ...
... . But if Melania Trump can do the same and get away with it? No thanks
. But if Melania Trump can do the same and get away with it? No thanks  . And what really gets me is how we're comparing her to other former first ladies who might face scrutiny for similar actions. Like, I get that some people are gonna say she was just using her platform for a good cause, but promoting a cryptocurrency from her position as first lady? That's just not right
. And what really gets me is how we're comparing her to other former first ladies who might face scrutiny for similar actions. Like, I get that some people are gonna say she was just using her platform for a good cause, but promoting a cryptocurrency from her position as first lady? That's just not right  .
. .
.

 . It's like, we're supposed to trust our first ladies to make good choices, right? But when it comes to this cryptocurrency stuff, suddenly it's all about profit and who gets to benefit
. It's like, we're supposed to trust our first ladies to make good choices, right? But when it comes to this cryptocurrency stuff, suddenly it's all about profit and who gets to benefit  . It's all about accountability, man...
. It's all about accountability, man...
 , have you tried any good ones lately? I went to this one place last weekend and they had the most amazing Korean BBQ tacos... anyway, back to this cryptocurrency scam thingy... isn't it wild that people can get rich quick but then just disappear with the money? It's like, what even is the point of having rules if no one's gonna follow them?
, have you tried any good ones lately? I went to this one place last weekend and they had the most amazing Korean BBQ tacos... anyway, back to this cryptocurrency scam thingy... isn't it wild that people can get rich quick but then just disappear with the money? It's like, what even is the point of having rules if no one's gonna follow them?  just wondering how this all went down... did she know about it or was she just a prop?
 just wondering how this all went down... did she know about it or was she just a prop?  and btw, has anyone tried to buy one of these coins? I'm curious
 and btw, has anyone tried to buy one of these coins? I'm curious 

 . But Melania Trump just gets a free pass? Not cool, guys
. But Melania Trump just gets a free pass? Not cool, guys 