NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's secret deal with US President Donald Trump over Greenland has left European officials scrambling to understand what exactly was agreed upon. According to a senior EU diplomat, Rutte negotiated this alone, blindsiding his European counterparts who had been trying to show unity in the face of escalating threats from the US.
While Trump announced that he and Rutte had reached "the framework of a future deal" over Greenland, top European officials remain unclear about what was agreed upon. The US President claimed that the possible deal involves US access to mineral rights, as well as collaboration on his proposed "Golden Dome" defense system.
However, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen stated that Denmark could negotiate on almost any issue but would not compromise on its sovereignty over Greenland. Greenland's premier Jens-Frederik Nielsen expressed similar concerns about the deal. NATO's supreme allied commander for Europe, Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, admitted that the alliance had no prior knowledge of the security framework agreed upon.
The agreement has sparked significant uncertainty among EU officials, with some expressing concern that Trump's commitment to the deal could ultimately be a way to divide them. The US President himself warned on his way back from Davos that "we have to have the ability to do exactly what we want to do" on Greenland.
Rutte and Trump have enjoyed a cordial working relationship, with some describing it as a "bromance." However, this has not helped to alleviate concerns among European officials about the US President's intentions. As Kaja Kallas, the EU's foreign policy chief, pointed out in an emergency summit on Thursday, transatlantic relations have taken a significant hit over the last week.
The deal raises questions about the limits of NATO's authority and the extent to which individual member states can be drawn into disputes with other countries. It also highlights the ongoing tension between the US and Europe over issues such as trade and security policy. As one EU diplomat noted, "Who can believe him?" regarding Trump's promises on Greenland, adding that his words do not carry significant weight.
For now, it remains to be seen how the deal will unfold, but its significance is clear: a major player in global politics has once again shown itself willing to pursue its interests at any cost.
While Trump announced that he and Rutte had reached "the framework of a future deal" over Greenland, top European officials remain unclear about what was agreed upon. The US President claimed that the possible deal involves US access to mineral rights, as well as collaboration on his proposed "Golden Dome" defense system.
However, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen stated that Denmark could negotiate on almost any issue but would not compromise on its sovereignty over Greenland. Greenland's premier Jens-Frederik Nielsen expressed similar concerns about the deal. NATO's supreme allied commander for Europe, Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, admitted that the alliance had no prior knowledge of the security framework agreed upon.
The agreement has sparked significant uncertainty among EU officials, with some expressing concern that Trump's commitment to the deal could ultimately be a way to divide them. The US President himself warned on his way back from Davos that "we have to have the ability to do exactly what we want to do" on Greenland.
Rutte and Trump have enjoyed a cordial working relationship, with some describing it as a "bromance." However, this has not helped to alleviate concerns among European officials about the US President's intentions. As Kaja Kallas, the EU's foreign policy chief, pointed out in an emergency summit on Thursday, transatlantic relations have taken a significant hit over the last week.
The deal raises questions about the limits of NATO's authority and the extent to which individual member states can be drawn into disputes with other countries. It also highlights the ongoing tension between the US and Europe over issues such as trade and security policy. As one EU diplomat noted, "Who can believe him?" regarding Trump's promises on Greenland, adding that his words do not carry significant weight.
For now, it remains to be seen how the deal will unfold, but its significance is clear: a major player in global politics has once again shown itself willing to pursue its interests at any cost.