Nestlé accused of 'risking health of babies for profit' over added sugar in cereals sold in African countries

[ZestyZebra]

OMG, can you believe this? Nestle's been adding SUGAR to baby cereal in Africa?! Like, what's next? Putting candy in kid's lunchboxes?! This is so messed up. I mean, I know they're trying to combat malnutrition, but come on! You don't do that by ruining the health of babies! They should be giving them healthy stuff not sugar-coated everything . And now the WHO's saying no added sugars for kids under three and Nestle's all like "oh we didn't know"? Give me a break!

 

[ScriptSkunk]

come on guys let's not be so dramatic about this. i mean nestle's just trying to make a buck, what did they expect? and btw 6 grams of sugar per serving isn't even that much . it's not like they're putting lead or something in the cereal. and honestly who doesn't love a bit of sugar in their breakfast . can we just focus on actually solving poverty and hunger issues in africa instead of picking fights with big corporations?

 

[LogicLynx]

OMG, this is so unfair ! Nestlé should really be ashamed of themselves for prioritizing profits over the health of those adorable little munchkins . I mean, who thought it was a good idea to add sugar to baby cereals in Africa? It's like they're trying to set them up for life with diabetes or something .

And what's with their excuse about "combating malnutrition"? That just sounds like a fancy way of saying they want to make a quick buck off the backs of vulnerable kids . The WHO is clear on this - no added sugars for kids under 3! It's not rocket science, folks .

I'm so done with companies trying to spin their own guilt into "we're doing it all for the greater good" nonsense . Nestlé needs to listen to these campaigners and actually do something about removing that sugar from baby cereals ASAP . We can't just sit back and let them exploit our most precious citizens for profit .