
So there you have it, another bunch of grand jury rejections that basically say "nah, we're good" on Trump-era prosecutions

. It's like they're playing some kind of twisted game of musical chairs with felony indictments. I mean, come on, if three consecutive grand jurors can't get on board, does that really mean the prosecution is solid?
And let's talk about Sidney Reid's defense – "not able to invoke fear" among citizens, huh? That's rich coming from a politician who's been accused of inciting hatred and division

. I'm not saying she's off the hook or anything (because, no, she's not), but it's clear that the DOJ is having some serious trouble getting cases past jurors these days.
But seriously, this trend has some major implications for the Trump-era DOJ's tactics. If grand juries are rejecting indictments left and right, does that mean prosecutors need to actually have a solid case instead of just throwing something together?

Let's hope so. This could be the first glimmer of hope we get for those who've been targeted by selective prosecution
