Target's Troubles Run Deeper Than a Smile Policy
In an effort to turn around its declining sales and reputation, Target has implemented a new policy that requires employees to "smile" at customers. The idea may seem harmless, but it's just another example of the company's broader struggle to connect with Black shoppers.
When Target announced that it was ending its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, many Black consumers boycotted the brand. The decision not only alienated long-time customers but also damaged the company's reputation in the process. Now, as the stock price continues to plummet, Target is trying to revive itself by ordering employees to smile.
However, this policy won't fix the underlying issues that led to the boycott. Target's failure to address its shortcomings will likely lead to more customers tattling on employees who don't meet their unrealistic expectations. Moreover, mandating smiles can have unintended consequences, such as making it difficult for employees to authentically connect with customers.
Research has shown that people struggle to identify genuine smiles on Black faces, which could lead to misinterpretations and misunderstandings. For instance, a study found that white people often mistake a genuine smile from a Black person for insincerity.
Target's policy also disregards the emotional toll of customer service work. Employees are already under pressure to provide excellent service without being expected to fake their emotions. Requiring them to "smile" further exacerbates this issue, particularly when dealing with difficult customers who may take out their frustrations on employees who are simply trying to do their job.
Ultimately, Target's troubles run deeper than a smile policy. The company must address its lack of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and work towards rebuilding trust with Black consumers. Until then, forcing employees to smile won't solve the problem; it will only perpetuate the cycle of unrealistic expectations and emotional labor.
In an effort to turn around its declining sales and reputation, Target has implemented a new policy that requires employees to "smile" at customers. The idea may seem harmless, but it's just another example of the company's broader struggle to connect with Black shoppers.
When Target announced that it was ending its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, many Black consumers boycotted the brand. The decision not only alienated long-time customers but also damaged the company's reputation in the process. Now, as the stock price continues to plummet, Target is trying to revive itself by ordering employees to smile.
However, this policy won't fix the underlying issues that led to the boycott. Target's failure to address its shortcomings will likely lead to more customers tattling on employees who don't meet their unrealistic expectations. Moreover, mandating smiles can have unintended consequences, such as making it difficult for employees to authentically connect with customers.
Research has shown that people struggle to identify genuine smiles on Black faces, which could lead to misinterpretations and misunderstandings. For instance, a study found that white people often mistake a genuine smile from a Black person for insincerity.
Target's policy also disregards the emotional toll of customer service work. Employees are already under pressure to provide excellent service without being expected to fake their emotions. Requiring them to "smile" further exacerbates this issue, particularly when dealing with difficult customers who may take out their frustrations on employees who are simply trying to do their job.
Ultimately, Target's troubles run deeper than a smile policy. The company must address its lack of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and work towards rebuilding trust with Black consumers. Until then, forcing employees to smile won't solve the problem; it will only perpetuate the cycle of unrealistic expectations and emotional labor.