The clock is ticking for lawmakers considering major changes to the US voting system ahead of November's elections. A recent proposal from President Donald Trump and some Republicans would overhaul the electoral landscape, but it's too little, too late.
As election administrators across the country continue to prepare for November, their plates are already full with tasks such as verifying thousands of signatures and training poll workers. They're doing everything they can to ensure a smooth voting process, but new rules proposed by Trump and his allies would create chaos at polling places nationwide.
Under the SAVE Act, Americans would be required to show proof of citizenship when registering to vote, while the Make Elections Great Again Act would effectively ban universal vote-by-mail systems used in several states. These changes are unnecessary and would disenfranchise millions of voters who don't have the necessary documents.
The problem is that these proposals come too close to election day. In most cases, laws should be finalized well before an election to allow for a smooth implementation process. The fact remains that any change to voting laws in a year ending with an even number – like November's elections – would be better off being made months or years earlier.
Judges have historically followed the principle of acting on changes to election rules at least 12 months before an election, rather than introducing drastic changes just before the vote. This approach ensures that both sides are prepared and aware of any changes, which helps maintain public confidence in elections.
In this case, Trump's proposal would undermine confidence in elections by creating unnecessary confusion and disenfranchising millions of voters. The US already has imperfect voting laws, but these proposals take it too far. It's time to stick with the rules that have been established for our democratic process – the coin toss is here, and it's time to play by the rules we agreed on.
As election administrators across the country continue to prepare for November, their plates are already full with tasks such as verifying thousands of signatures and training poll workers. They're doing everything they can to ensure a smooth voting process, but new rules proposed by Trump and his allies would create chaos at polling places nationwide.
Under the SAVE Act, Americans would be required to show proof of citizenship when registering to vote, while the Make Elections Great Again Act would effectively ban universal vote-by-mail systems used in several states. These changes are unnecessary and would disenfranchise millions of voters who don't have the necessary documents.
The problem is that these proposals come too close to election day. In most cases, laws should be finalized well before an election to allow for a smooth implementation process. The fact remains that any change to voting laws in a year ending with an even number – like November's elections – would be better off being made months or years earlier.
Judges have historically followed the principle of acting on changes to election rules at least 12 months before an election, rather than introducing drastic changes just before the vote. This approach ensures that both sides are prepared and aware of any changes, which helps maintain public confidence in elections.
In this case, Trump's proposal would undermine confidence in elections by creating unnecessary confusion and disenfranchising millions of voters. The US already has imperfect voting laws, but these proposals take it too far. It's time to stick with the rules that have been established for our democratic process – the coin toss is here, and it's time to play by the rules we agreed on.
. I mean, come on, 12 months before an election? That's like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. It's not going to end well, trust me. We need stability and consistency when it comes to our voting system, not these half-baked proposals that are just meant to stir up controversy.
. It's not fair to punish people for that. And what about all the voters who are elderly or disabled? They shouldn't have to deal with this extra hassle.
. I'm so tired of politicians trying to make voting harder just to silence certain groups of people. It's not going to work. We need to stand up for our democracy and fight for the right to vote, no matter what.
. I mean, can you imagine trying to implement new voter ID laws with thousands of signatures to verify in just a few months? It's a recipe for disaster 
.
.
. And get rid of universal vote-by-mail? Are you kidding me?! That's one of the best things about our voting system 
. Just leave it alone and let's focus on getting out the vote in November 
. The fact that they're even proposing this stuff is just so...so...frustrating 
.
. they're going to create chaos at polling places and disenfranchise millions of voters who don't have proof of citizenship or mail-in ballot options. it's just not fair and will undermine public confidence in our democratic process. we need to stick with what works, like the coin toss approach that has been used for years 
. why are they trying to rush these changes? it's just politics as usual 
. It just goes to show that when you try to rush through something important, like the foundation of our democracy, it's bound to crumble 
. The thing is, change is needed but timing is EVERYTHING 
. If they had done this months ago, we could've gotten used to the new rules and everyone would be on the same page 
. But nope, now it's just a bunch of chaos and uncertainty 
. It's like, can't they see that this isn't about changing laws, but about trusting our democratic system? 
. And what's with the SAVE Act and Make Elections Great Again Act names - it sounds like a bad joke 
. Seriously though, this would disenfranchise so many people who don't have the necessary documents or can't get to the polls in time. It's just not fair 
.
. Judges have always done it that way, and it helps keep people confident in our democratic process 
. We don't need more drama or confusion on top of everything else. Can't we just stick with what works? 
Stick with what we've got and move on 
!
. I'm all for making voting easier, but not at the cost of disenfranchising people who can't provide the necessary documents... that just doesn't seem fair 
These proposed changes are gonna mess with the whole voting system, and it's not like it needs fixing 
... and election day is just around the corner 
! We need some calm and consideration here, not last-minute power plays 
. Can't we just stick with the system we've got, flaws and all? 