CBS's 60 minutes has long been known for featuring high-profile and often divisive guests, but the latest episode has sparked widespread criticism after hosting GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on the program.
Critics argue that the show is amplifying Greene's extreme views by giving her a platform to share her opinions without adequate critique or counterpoint from CBS correspondent Lesley Stahl. Greene has been accused of promoting conspiracy theories, spreading hate speech, and denying the validity of school shootings and gun violence. The segment was widely panned on social media, with many accusing 60 minutes of legitimizing Greene's divisive rhetoric.
Former CNN commentator Adam Kinzinger, a Republican, criticized the show for its decision to feature Greene, tweeting that it was "insane" and "a bad move." Journalist Molly Jong-Fast also slammed the program, saying they were "spending their currency on the Jewish space lasers woman."
Greene's own response was more measured. When asked by 60 minutes why she thinks school shootings are fake, Greene did not deny the allegations but instead deflected the question. The interview has left many wondering if CBS is trying to normalize Greene's divisive views or simply provide a platform for her to express herself.
However, some might argue that the segment recalls CBS's history of featuring controversial guests. The network has interviewed high-profile figures like Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini in the past. If that is the case, then 60 minutes may be trying to follow a long tradition of hosting provocative guests.
One thing is certain, though - when Marjorie Taylor Greene was invited on 60 Minutes to talk about her views as a congresswoman, some folks thought it was an honor or at least something worthy of conversation.
Critics argue that the show is amplifying Greene's extreme views by giving her a platform to share her opinions without adequate critique or counterpoint from CBS correspondent Lesley Stahl. Greene has been accused of promoting conspiracy theories, spreading hate speech, and denying the validity of school shootings and gun violence. The segment was widely panned on social media, with many accusing 60 minutes of legitimizing Greene's divisive rhetoric.
Former CNN commentator Adam Kinzinger, a Republican, criticized the show for its decision to feature Greene, tweeting that it was "insane" and "a bad move." Journalist Molly Jong-Fast also slammed the program, saying they were "spending their currency on the Jewish space lasers woman."
Greene's own response was more measured. When asked by 60 minutes why she thinks school shootings are fake, Greene did not deny the allegations but instead deflected the question. The interview has left many wondering if CBS is trying to normalize Greene's divisive views or simply provide a platform for her to express herself.
However, some might argue that the segment recalls CBS's history of featuring controversial guests. The network has interviewed high-profile figures like Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini in the past. If that is the case, then 60 minutes may be trying to follow a long tradition of hosting provocative guests.
One thing is certain, though - when Marjorie Taylor Greene was invited on 60 Minutes to talk about her views as a congresswoman, some folks thought it was an honor or at least something worthy of conversation.
! Can't believe CBS would give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform like that. I mean, she's been spreading conspiracy theories and hate speech left and right, and they're just letting her spew it all over the air? It's insane 
. And don't even get me started on how they didn't even try to fact-check her claims. Like, what's next? Giving a platform to anti-vaxxers or flat earthers too? 
.
. But come on, Marjorie Taylor Greene is a whole different ball game 
. Can't we just have some basic standards for journalistic integrity? 
I feel kinda torn about this one. On one hand, I think CBS has a right to let Rep. Greene share her thoughts, even if they're extreme. We live in a country that values free speech, after all. But on the other hand, can't they have also tried to bring some balance to the conversation? It seems like Lesley Stahl was pretty straightforward with her questions, but maybe she could've dug deeper? 
. But come on, shouldn't they fact-check her a bit more? Like, isn't the whole point of 60 minutes to have informed discussions and stuff? Instead, it just feels like they're giving her a soapbox and letting her spew out her conspiracy theories 
. It just feels like CBS is getting played by Greene and her team 
.
. And hey, if that's the case, then more power to 'em 
. Just hope it doesn't normalize her brand of crazy 
It don't sit right with me... but at the same time, you gotta wonder if they're tryin' to stir up some controversy or somethin'. I mean, have you seen the way she dodged that question about school shootings? 
Either way, it's all just a bit too suspicious for my taste 
.
... like, I get why they were triggered - Greene's views are super concerning and hurtful to a lot of people 
... and yeah, maybe they didn't do the best job of critiquing her views, but shouldn't we be listening to everyone's perspectives, even if we don't agree with them? 
like tim mcveigh, who's basically a domestic terrorist 
and ayatollah khomeini, who was a total dictator 
so maybe cbs is just following their own trail of controversy? 
the fact that the segment got panned so hard is wild . like i get where everyone's coming from but i think its kinda interesting how people are still debating whether cbs did the right thing by having her on . imo its all about balance, you know? 
. I mean, come on, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been spreading conspiracy theories and hate speech left and right, and now CBS is giving her a platform to spew her toxic rhetoric? It's just ridiculous 
. And don't even get me started on how Lesley Stahl didn't even try to challenge her on some of those crazy claims 
. We need more accountability and more critical thinking on these types of shows. It's not like she's some kind of innocent victim or anything 
.
! Just kidding, kinda... but seriously, who thought it was a good idea to give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform? Like, I get it, she's a congresswoman and all, but come on, folks! Don't they have fact-checkers for a reason?