SlothSurge
Well-known member
Favourite TV Shows Have Run Their Course: Why One-and-Done Series Are a Blessing
Streaming services have ushered in a new era of binge-watching where viewers can devour entire seasons of their favourite shows at breakneck speed. However, with the endless episodes comes a concerning trend - bloated storytelling that fails to live up to its initial promise. It's time for television creators to reevaluate their approach and remember when less truly is more.
For many fans, the second series of their beloved show becomes a crushing disappointment. Gone are the tantalizing plot twists and cliffhangers; instead, we're met with a lackluster narrative that fails to engage. The recent premiere of Stranger Things season two serves as a prime example - its creative momentum fizzles out, leaving viewers underwhelmed.
The bloating of shows has become an epidemic. Horror-mystery series like Yellowjackets, which initially boasted a rich premise and outstanding cast, has now revealed signs of fatigue. Its writers have clearly lost sight of the original story's trajectory, opting for a meandering narrative that prioritizes shallow character introductions over meaningful plot development.
Even seemingly innocuous shows like Emily in Paris and Squid Game have fallen prey to this affliction. Gone are the shocking surprises; instead, we're treated to formulaic tropes and tired clichés. It's high time for creators to reassess their approach and consider when it's better to bow out on a high note.
The concept of limited series - also known as one-and-done shows - has proven to be a resounding success. By ending with a definitive, self-contained narrative, television creators can avoid the pitfalls of overextension and ensure that viewers are left with a lasting impression rather than disappointment.
Take My So-Called Life, for instance, which deftly captured the essence of adolescence in its 90s heyday. Despite its brief run, it remains a beloved classic - not because it was stretched out to fit more episodes but because its creators knew when to stop. The show's final episode was imperfectly resolved, leaving viewers with an unspoken understanding that some questions would forever remain unanswered.
As we move forward in the television landscape, let us remember that sometimes less is indeed more. By embracing the limitations of limited series and eschewing bloated storytelling, creators can craft shows that truly resonate with audiences - not just those who will watch them until the bitter end, but those who will carry their memories long after the credits roll.
Streaming services have ushered in a new era of binge-watching where viewers can devour entire seasons of their favourite shows at breakneck speed. However, with the endless episodes comes a concerning trend - bloated storytelling that fails to live up to its initial promise. It's time for television creators to reevaluate their approach and remember when less truly is more.
For many fans, the second series of their beloved show becomes a crushing disappointment. Gone are the tantalizing plot twists and cliffhangers; instead, we're met with a lackluster narrative that fails to engage. The recent premiere of Stranger Things season two serves as a prime example - its creative momentum fizzles out, leaving viewers underwhelmed.
The bloating of shows has become an epidemic. Horror-mystery series like Yellowjackets, which initially boasted a rich premise and outstanding cast, has now revealed signs of fatigue. Its writers have clearly lost sight of the original story's trajectory, opting for a meandering narrative that prioritizes shallow character introductions over meaningful plot development.
Even seemingly innocuous shows like Emily in Paris and Squid Game have fallen prey to this affliction. Gone are the shocking surprises; instead, we're treated to formulaic tropes and tired clichés. It's high time for creators to reassess their approach and consider when it's better to bow out on a high note.
The concept of limited series - also known as one-and-done shows - has proven to be a resounding success. By ending with a definitive, self-contained narrative, television creators can avoid the pitfalls of overextension and ensure that viewers are left with a lasting impression rather than disappointment.
Take My So-Called Life, for instance, which deftly captured the essence of adolescence in its 90s heyday. Despite its brief run, it remains a beloved classic - not because it was stretched out to fit more episodes but because its creators knew when to stop. The show's final episode was imperfectly resolved, leaving viewers with an unspoken understanding that some questions would forever remain unanswered.
As we move forward in the television landscape, let us remember that sometimes less is indeed more. By embracing the limitations of limited series and eschewing bloated storytelling, creators can craft shows that truly resonate with audiences - not just those who will watch them until the bitter end, but those who will carry their memories long after the credits roll.
I'm so over these new TV shows that just keep going and going 
. Like, Stranger Things season two was literally so underwhelming...I mean, what happened to the cliffhangers? And don't even get me started on Yellowjackets...it's like they ran out of ideas halfway through 
. I'm all for a good story arc, but come on, sometimes less is more, right? 
The whole "one-and-done" thing might be the way to go - just end it when it's good and let people remember the good stuff 
. And can we talk about how some shows just become formulaic after 3-4 seasons? Like Emily in Paris...who thought that was a good idea? 
Just stick to what you know and don't overthink it, creators! 
and yellowjackets is like what happened to that great idea? 
Newsflash: less is actually more when it comes to TV shows! 
One-and-done series are the way to go. I mean, have you seen The Handmaid's Tale? That show was so well-crafted and thought-provoking, and it ended on a high note. But now, all we get is more and more filler content that just pads out an already good story.
. Like, I get it, they wanna make more money and all that, but honestly, it's just getting exhausting watching stuff that's lost its magic after 2-3 seasons 
. Can't we just have a show where the creators know when to stop it? You know, like My So-Called Life 
. That show was perfect just the way it was, and I love how it left some things unanswered, 'cause that's what makes it so memorable, right? 
. Shows like Stranger Things and Yellowjackets used to be so hyped up at first, but now they're just meh 
. And don't even get me started on Emily in Paris - who thought it was a good idea to turn a short-lived show into an entire season? 
. Shows that know when to stop are always more impactful than ones that drag on forever. Like My So-Called Life - what a classic 
. The show's creators knew when to cut out and let the audience fill in the gaps... now that's how it's done 
.
but then just meh 
. one-and-done series are the way forward 
. it's not about fitting in extra eps, it's about impact 
like yellowjackets, they're still trying to explore themes of trauma and female relationships in a way that's super relevant to our times. and emily in paris, come on it's just a fun guilty pleasure show 
but seriously, i think the concept of limited series is overrated too sometimes shows need more than 6 episodes to really flesh out their characters and storylines 
. I mean, have you seen Squid Game? That was a masterclass in storytelling 
. It's like My So-Called Life - it left me wanting more, but also feeling satisfied with the ending 
. Can't wait to see what other shows will go for this limited series approach