Slotkin goes silent when pressed on past Trump guard ‘shooting’ claims after DC attack

Senate Democrat Elissa Slotkin Remains Silent on Past Comments About Trump Guard 'Shooting' Claims Following DC Attack

Senator Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., has remained tight-lipped about her previous statements regarding the need for government officials to push back against President Donald Trump's orders if he were to order military personnel to fire on civilians. This comes after a shooting in Washington D.C. that left one National Guard member dead and another critically injured.

Slotkin's alarm about the National Guard and other federal troops originally stemmed from comments President Trump allegedly made to former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper during his first term. According to Slotkin, Trump allegedly asked Esper to send in the 82 Airborne into Washington D.C. to quell peaceful protests, adding that if necessary, Trump could say 'shoot at their legs' - a comment Esper later included in his book "A Sacred Oath".

Trump has denied ever making such a statement. However, this alleged comment prompted Slotkin and other Democrat lawmakers to release a video earlier this month, calling for service members to not give up the ship and urging them to disregard illegal orders.

The FBI has identified the shooter behind the DC attack as 29-year-old Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who is in custody facing first-degree murder charges. The bureau describes his attack as targeted, investigating it as an act of terrorism.

Slotkin and her Democratic colleagues are now facing a reversal of their earlier concerns about Trump's use of federal troops, following the DC attack.
 
I'm kinda surprised Elissa Slotkin is being so quiet on this one 🤔. Given what happened in D.C. and how she initially spoke out against Trump's orders, you'd think she'd be all over this like a bad habit 💁‍♀️. Don't get me wrong, the DC attack was sickening, but I'm still skeptical about her sudden silence on this issue 🤷‍♂️. Wasn't she just last month saying service members should stand down if Trump gave orders that went against the law? Now, it's like she's conveniently forgotten all about it 😒. The FBI identifying the shooter as a terrorist doesn't change my mind - we still need to have this conversation about accountability and who gives orders in times of crisis 💥.
 
I'm so confused about Elissa Slotkin not talking about this anymore 🤔. She was super clear that if Trump wanted to order military personnel to fire on civilians, we should push back against him as a government official. I get why she'd want to be quiet now that the DC attack happened and all - one National Guard member is dead and another is in ICU 😔. But can't we just talk about this stuff? It feels like our leaders are too scared to speak up, especially when it comes to things like Trump's orders. What if he tries to do something crazy again? We need people like Slotkin who'll call out his behavior 💪. I'm still not convinced that Trump didn't make those comments, though 🤷‍♀️.
 
can't believe elissa slotkin is playing dumb on this one 🤔 she was all like "if trump orders us to shoot civilians, we're not gonna do it" but now that there's a real life shooter in custody and the FBI says it was terrorism... crickets 🎧 doesn't add up imo. maybe she's trying to save her skin for 2026 elections? 🤷‍♂️ the thing is, trump might've denied making those comments, but we all know he can be pretty reckless sometimes. still, as a democrat senator, slotkin should at least have some explanation for why she changed her tune so quickly 😬
 
Man, what's going on with this lady Slotkin? I mean, she was all worked up about Trump saying something crazy to Esper, but then we got this shooting in D.C. and she's just quiet as a mouse 🤐... I get that politicians gotta keep their cool, but it feels like she's not owning up to what really happened here. I'm kinda surprised the FBI is calling it terrorism - seems like they got some solid evidence. Trump's denying the whole thing, but if he did say something stupid, shouldn't Slotkin be speaking out about it now? Guess we'll just have to wait and see how this all plays out... *shrugs*
 
OMG, this is wild! So Elissa Slotkin was like super vocal about how Trump asked Mark Esper to order in some serious firepower against peaceful protesters, but now she's just ghosting the whole thing. I get it, you don't wanna be seen as anti-military or whatever, but at the same time, it feels like she's trying to save face after this latest attack in D.C. The fact that the shooter was an Afghan national and it was described as a targeted act of terrorism is giving me all sorts of mixed emotions 🤯💔. It's hard to know what to believe anymore. Trump denied making those comments, but if he did... it's like, how could you just ask someone to order in troops to quell protests? It feels so extreme 💥. I don't think we're gonna ever really know the truth about this one 🤷‍♀️.
 
😕 I'm kinda surprised that Elissa Slotkin isn't talking about this more, considering how big of a deal her initial comments were back in 2019 🤯. It was one thing when it wasn't happening already, but now with the DC shooting and all... 💔 I think she should at least acknowledge what's changed since then 🙏. It's not like Trump is gonna start sending troops into peaceful protests anytime soon 🔴✅. But hey, politics can be weird 😐
 
I'm kinda confused about this whole thing... Slotkin was like "hey guys be prepared to disobey Trump if he orders us to fire on civilians" but then suddenly she's all quiet? It feels like she only spoke up when it suited her to do so, you know? I mean, I get that politicians say things they don't really believe in order to rile up their base, but this one seems a bit sus. Like, did she not care about the potential consequences of Trump's actions back then? 🤔
 
🤔 It's quite puzzling that Senator Elissa Slotkin is choosing to remain silent on her past comments regarding President Trump's alleged order to shoot at civilians 🚫. Given the recent DC attack and the FBI describing it as a targeted act of terrorism 💣, one might expect her to reiterate her stance against such orders in light of new information. The fact that she hasn't spoken out raises concerns about her commitment to protecting American citizens from harm 🙏. Moreover, the reversal of her earlier concerns by her Democratic colleagues seems to suggest that they may be revisiting their positions or trying to distance themselves from Slotkin's original statement 🔄. Regardless, this situation highlights the need for clear communication and consistency in the face of uncertainty 🤝.
 
I'm kinda disappointed in Elissa Slotkin rn... I mean, she was all about speaking out against Trump's comments back in 2017, but now that there's an actual shooting incident and one national guard member is dead, she just shuts up 🤐. It feels like she's only talking when it's convenient for her to do so, especially considering how she and other Democrats were so vocal about pushing back against Trump's orders during the protests. I'm not saying I agree with everything they said, but at least they were willing to have a conversation about it. Now that there's real-world consequences, it's like they're all quiet as mice 🐭.
 
🤔 It's quite puzzling that Senator Elissa Slotkin has remained mum on her previous comments about President Trump's alleged orders to have military personnel fire on civilians 🚫. Given the recent shooting in Washington D.C., which left a National Guard member dead and another critically injured, it's ironic that she hasn't spoken out 🤷‍♀️. Her initial concerns about Trump's behavior were rooted in his comments to Mark Esper, which some saw as a threat to public safety 😬. While Trump has denied making such statements, the fact remains that Slotkin and her fellow Democrats have been vocal about urging service members to disobey illegal orders 💪. Now, with the DC attack investigation revealing it was an act of terrorism, one wonders if their earlier concerns were valid 🕵️‍♀️. It's almost as if they're being forced to reevaluate their stance 👀.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this one 🤯... so Elissa Slotkin is just keeping mum about those crazy comments she made about Trump wanting to send in the 82nd Airborne to quell protests 🤔? Like, what's up with that? I know we're trying to stay neutral and all, but come on, it's a pretty big deal! 💥 And now, after this DC attack, her party is kinda backing down from their earlier stance... just seems weird to me 😐.
 
I'm low-key surprised she's being super quiet about this 🤔. I mean, she was all like "we need to push back against Trump" just a few months ago when he allegedly said that crazy stuff about the National Guard. Now she's just... silent 💁‍♀️. Like, isn't it her job to speak up and address these things? Shouldn't she be using this incident as an opportunity to reiterate what she originally said? It feels like she's just backing down 🚫. I don't get it 😒.
 
🤔 why did Slotkin stay silent? 🙅‍♂️ this is kinda weird considering how serious she was about trump's comments before... was it because she didn't want to be seen as being against trump even after what happened in dc? 🤷‍♀️ or maybe she just didn't want to stir up more controversy? 🚫 i don't get why she's keeping quiet, especially since this is a pretty big deal. did she not see the connection between what happened and her original concerns about trump's comments? 😕
 
Ugh, I'm so torn about this 🤔... on one hand, I think it's kinda messed up that Slotkin is being super quiet about her past comments when it comes to Trump's alleged orders to shoot at protesters. Like, isn't she supposed to be a strong advocate for protecting people's rights? 🤷‍♀️

And now, with this DC attack and the fact that the shooter was motivated by terrorism, I'm like... what even is happening, right? 😱 It's crazy how fast the narrative can shift. One minute you're calling out Trump's alleged orders to shoot at protesters, and the next you're all like "oh wait, maybe we shouldn't be worried about that after all"... 🙅‍♀️

I'm not saying Slotkin is being cowardly or anything, but it just feels like she's kinda lost her voice on this whole thing. And what's with the timing? It's like she's only speaking up now because the news cycle has moved on to something else... 📰
 
omg u gotta wonder what's goin on here... senator slotkin just ghosted on all these comments she made like 2 yrs ago about trump tryna order military to fire on protesters now that some dude gets shot in dc and everyone's all like "wait a minute, did this even happen?" 🤔 anyway it's kinda sus that the FBI is callin it an act of terrorism but still no word from slotkin on what's good... anyway u can check out more on this here: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...ization-comments-following-dc-attack-n1234931 🚫
 
I'm kinda split on this one 🤔. On one hand, I think it's pretty concerning that Slotkin hasn't spoken up more about her past comments, especially after something like what happened in D.C. It seems like she's suddenly changed her tune, and it's a bit fishy 😒. But at the same time, the situation is really complex, and you can't just take things at face value. I mean, we still don't know for sure if Trump actually made those comments or not 🤷‍♀️.

It's also worth noting that the whole "shoot at their legs" comment has a pretty chilling ring to it 🚫. And given what happened in D.C., it's understandable that Slotkin and others want to be more cautious about how they talk about Trump's actions. Maybe she's just being pragmatic right now, but it's still weird that she hasn't said anything 🤔.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that this whole thing has me a bit confused 🙃. There are a lot of factors at play here, and it's hard to know what's really going on 💥.
 
🤔 I mean, come on, if Elissa Slotkin is gonna sit there and not say anything after her comments were basically saying that Trump can order his troops to just shoot people, it's kinda rich now. I get that she's probably worried about being seen as anti-military or something, but a dead guy in DC? That's like a wake-up call for everyone. It's not about being pro-Trump or anti-anything, it's about whether or not the military should just follow orders no matter what. If they can't do that, then who's gonna protect us? 🤷‍♂️
 
🤔 I'm kinda surprised that Elissa Slotkin is being super quiet about those old comments she made about Trump's alleged orders to fire on civilians 🚫... especially after this latest shooting in D.C. It's like she's saying "hold my horses" 🐎 when it comes to taking a stance on something that should've been a major concern for her as a senator 💁‍♀️. I mean, what if Trump really did make those comments and they're true? Shouldn't we be having a more open conversation about how our service members are trained to handle situations like this? 🤷‍♂️ The FBI's description of the attack as targeted terrorism has got me thinking that maybe these kinds of incidents can happen anywhere, not just in the capital 🌆. We need more transparency and accountability from lawmakers on issues like this 💬.
 
🤔 I'm not sure if I should be surprised that Slotkin is keeping mum on this one. I mean, it's been a while since she brought up those comments about Trump and the National Guard. You'd think she'd want to revisit them now that we've got a tragedy like what happened in DC. But at the same time, I get why she might not want to jump into anything right now... I guess only time will tell if she's gonna weigh in on this one or just let it slide 🤷‍♂️
 
Back
Top