The New Yorker at 100: Netflix documentary dives inside a groundbreaking magazine

A new documentary series about The New Yorker, one of America's most influential publications, offers a fascinating glimpse into the magazine's rich history and enduring legacy. Marshall Curry, an acclaimed director, has spent years researching and filming for his new project, which explores the magazine's 100-year journey from its humble beginnings as a satirical publication to its current status as a multimedia brand.

Curry's documentary delves into the inner workings of The New Yorker, revealing the complexities of its editorial process and the diverse range of voices that contribute to its unique perspective. With interviews featuring prominent writers and editors, including Julianne Moore, Jesse Eisenberg, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Sarah Jessica Parker, Molly Ringwald, FranΓ§oise Mouly, David Remnick, Jon Lee Anderson, Rachel Syme, Ronan Farrow, and Ann Hermes, the documentary provides an intimate look at the people behind the publication.

Through its engaging narrative and stunning visuals, The New Yorker at 100 shines a light on the magazine's remarkable history. From Truman Capote's groundbreaking In Cold Blood to the New Yorker's rigorous fact-checking department, the film showcases the publication's commitment to quality journalism and its ability to adapt to changing times.

One of the documentary's greatest strengths lies in its portrayal of The New Yorker as an institution that has grown and evolved over the years. Curry's film captures the passion and dedication of its writers, editors, and readers, who are united by their love for the magazine's unique voice and perspective. As Curry notes, "They're making handmade, exquisitely crafted sushi for two seatings a night at their small restaurant for people who love and care about perfectly made sushi."

Despite its many accomplishments, The New Yorker still faces challenges in an increasingly complex media landscape. The documentary touches on the magazine's protracted collective bargaining fight with CondΓ© Nast, which has sparked concerns about its future direction. However, Curry remains optimistic, suggesting that The New Yorker will continue to thrive as long as it stays true to its core values and commitment to quality journalism.

Ultimately, The New Yorker at 100 is a must-see for anyone interested in the world of publishing, journalism, or American culture. With its engaging narrative, stunning visuals, and fascinating interviews, this documentary series offers a compelling exploration of one of America's most beloved and enduring institutions.
 
I think it's so cool that The New Yorker is getting a documentary series πŸ“šπŸ’‘! 100 years is like, whoa, that's a long time in the making πŸ˜‚. I love how Marshall Curry has spent years researching and filming for this project - it shows he really cares about telling their story πŸ™. And can you believe all those amazing people are featured in the documentary? Julianne Moore, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie... I'm so curious to see them share their experiences πŸ’¬. It's also great that Curry is highlighting The New Yorker's commitment to quality journalism - we need more of that these days πŸ“°. And yeah, it's interesting to see how the magazine has grown and evolved over the years... sometimes you wonder what they'll do next πŸ€”.
 
I'm low-key obsessed with this docu-series 🀩 - it's like getting a behind-the-scenes pass to The New Yorker's sacred inner workings πŸ˜‚. Marshall Curry's done an incredible job showcasing the magazine's history & all its quirky, brilliant writers πŸ“š. I mean, who wouldn't want to see Julianne Moore and Jesse Eisenberg chatting about their experiences? πŸ’¬ And can we talk about the cinematography - it's stunning! But what really resonates with me is how Curry highlights The New Yorker's dedication to quality journalism & its willingness to adapt (like that hilarious fact-checking montage πŸ“Š). It's clear he has a deep respect for the institution, and I think most fans of the magazine would agree. One thing that did strike me as interesting was the docu's take on CondΓ© Nast - it's clear they're not afraid to tackle the tough stuff πŸ’ͺ. Overall, this docu is an absolute must-watch for anyone who loves The New Yorker (or even just good storytelling) πŸŽ₯πŸ‘
 
I'm not sure I buy all the hype around this docu-series πŸ€”. 100 years of The New Yorker is definitely impressive, but does it really need a fancy film to tell us that? I mean, we've already got the magazine itself, with its archives and history section online... why do we need a documentary to explain what's going on behind the scenes? And what's up with all these big-name celebs in it? Just feels like a bunch of A-list folks getting paid to promote The New Yorker πŸ€‘. Plus, I'm not convinced that this docu-series really adds anything new or insightful to the conversation... just more feel-good fluff about "the people behind the publication". Give me something with a little more substance and critical thinking 😐.
 
I just watched this new docu on The New Yorker and it's so cool 🀩! I mean, I've always loved the mag, but to see all these behind-the-scenes stories about how they do what they do is really interesting. I love Julianne Moore in it, she seems so down-to-earth and funny πŸ˜‚. And Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's segment is like, totally thought-provoking 🀯. But what really gets me is how the documentary shows that The New Yorker isn't just about its famous writers, but also about all the people working behind the scenes to make it happen. Like, those sushi chefs 🍣, they're making something from scratch every night! It's like, totally inspiring. The only thing that bummed me out a bit was when it talked about the struggle with CondΓ© Nast, I wish they'd just resolved their issues already 😩.
 
man... i'm loving this docu on The New Yorker, it's like they're giving us a behind-the-scenes look at the magic that goes into creating some of the best journalism out there πŸ“šπŸ“°. but what really got me thinking is how much we need publications like this right now - with so many outlets churning out clickbait and sensationalism, The New Yorker's commitment to quality and depth is more important than ever πŸ’‘. and let's be real, who wouldn't want to peek into the inner workings of that iconic magazine? πŸ€” especially with all those amazing writers and editors featured in the docu - it's like we're getting a masterclass on what it means to do journalism right πŸ‘. anyway, i'm gonna have to watch this docu ASAP and get my thoughts on the collective bargaining fight - sounds like there's some serious passion and dedication going into that 🀝
 
🀯 I'm so hyped about this new docu on The New Yorker! πŸ“° It's like they're giving us a behind-the-scenes look at the people who make that iconic mag tick πŸ”. I mean, can you even imagine having dinner with Julianne Moore or Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie? 😲 And the way they've woven together Truman Capote's In Cold Blood to the present day is pure magic ✨. But seriously, it's crazy to think about how The New Yorker has adapted over the years - from satirical publication to multimedia brand πŸ“±. It's like they're saying, "Hey, we're not just a mag, we're a community πŸ’–." And honestly, I'm a little worried about their future direction πŸ€” but as long as they keep pushing quality journalism πŸ”₯, I'll be here for it πŸ‘.
 
you know what strikes me about this docu-series... it's how The New Yorker's story is woven into the fabric of american history πŸ€”. like, think about it - this magazine has been around for over a century, chronicling the country's growth pains and triumphs... its influence on literature, politics, and pop culture can't be overstated πŸ“šπŸ“°. but what's interesting to me is how The New Yorker's identity remains so rooted in its core values, despite facing new challenges in this chaotic media landscape πŸŒͺ️. the fact that Curry highlights the magazine's commitment to quality journalism feels almost... quaint? in a way that makes you wonder if it's even possible to maintain such integrity in today's fast-paced digital age πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. yet, at the same time, it's refreshing to see a publication still standing for what it believes in πŸ’ͺ. anyway, this docu feels like more than just a history lesson - it's an exploration of the human need for stories and truth that transcends time and media πŸ“Ί.
 
I think it's kinda cool that they're highlighting The New Yorker's 100-year journey πŸŽ‰. I mean, the magazine has been around for so long, it's crazy to think about how much history is behind those iconic covers πŸ˜‚. And Marshall Curry did a great job of capturing the passion and dedication of its writers and readers – it's clear he really respects what they do πŸ’―. The fact that they still have their collective bargaining fight with CondΓ© Nast going on might be worrying for some, but I think the documentary shows just how resilient they are 🀝. Plus, with all those famous interviews in one place, it's like a treasure trove of insights into American culture and journalism πŸ‘€.
 
πŸ“°πŸ’‘ I'm loving how this docu-series highlights The New Yorker's quirky personality & the passion of its writers & editors! πŸ€“ The way it showcases their dedication to quality journalism is so inspiring, especially in today's fast-paced online world where truth can be hard to find 🌎. Marshall Curry did an amazing job capturing the essence of this iconic mag. I also appreciate how the doc explores the complexities behind its editorial process – who knew there was more to making The New Yorker than just clever writing? 😊
 
I'm not buying that The New Yorker will always be around, you know? πŸ€” They've been struggling to stay relevant for years and I think this documentary is just glossing over the problems they're trying to hide. Like, what about all the younger writers who are being pushed out by the old guard? And don't even get me started on the fact that CondΓ© Nast is still holding them hostage with their collective bargaining fight. It's like they're using The New Yorker as a cash cow or something πŸ’Έ. I'm not saying it's not an institution, but let's be real, institutions can be just as stifling and outdated as anything else. Maybe it's time for a shake-up? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm low-key obsessed with The New Yorker! 🀩 I mean, who doesn't love the iconic cartoons, witty writing, and insightful commentary? It's like they're speaking straight to my soul πŸ˜‚. And can we talk about the writers and editors featured in this docu-series? Soooo talented! πŸ™Œ Julianne Moore, Jesse Eisenberg, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie... I'm dyin' over here πŸ’€. The way it showcases the inner workings of the magazine is like a masterclass in journalism 101 πŸ”. And I love how it highlights the challenges they're facing in the media landscape - we need more publications like that, you know? πŸ“°πŸ‘
 
I'm loving this docu on The New Yorker πŸ“šπŸ‘ it's crazy to think about how far they've come since Truman Capote wrote In Cold Blood... the way they showcase the inner workings is so refreshing, like you get to see the people behind the publication, not just their work. 🀝 and I'm intrigued by the collective bargaining fight with CondΓ© Nast - it raises some interesting questions about the future of journalism in general. πŸ’Ό but what really got me was how Curry highlights the passion and dedication of its writers and readers... it's this sense of community that makes The New Yorker so special, like they're all making something beautiful together 🍣😊
 
πŸ“°πŸ’‘ I think it's so cool that Marshall Curry is bringing The New Yorker's history to life through his docu-series! πŸŽ₯ You can really feel the passion and dedication of its writers, editors, and readers – it's like they're making sushi from scratch (in a good way 😊) for people who love quality journalism. I've always been fascinated by how the magazine has evolved over time, from Truman Capote to today's lineup of talented contributors. The fact that Curry highlights the collective bargaining fight as a challenge is totally valid – it's not easy staying true to your core values in the ever-changing media landscape. But overall, this doc series feels like a love letter to The New Yorker, and I'm excited to check it out! πŸ“ΊπŸ‘
 
I'm loving this docu series about The New Yorker πŸ“Ί! It's crazy to think the mag has been around for 100 years - that's insane πŸ’₯. I mean, who knew Truman Capote wrote In Cold Blood for them? That's some major literary history right there πŸ“š. And the fact they're highlighting the writers and editors is genius - we need more people sharing their perspectives and passions online 🀝.

I also love how it showcases the magazine's commitment to quality journalism and adapting to changing times πŸ’ͺ. As a reader, it's cool to see behind-the-scenes stuff like their rigorous fact-checking department πŸ‘€. The interviews with famous folks are also super insightful - I've always wanted to know more about Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie πŸ€“.

My only concern is that the documentary touches on some tough times for the mag, but Marshall Curry's optimism is really inspiring πŸ’•. It's clear he loves The New Yorker just like we do 😊. Can't wait to check out the docu series and learn more about this incredible institution πŸŽ₯
 
OMG, I'm so hyped to see a docu about The New Yorker!!! 🀩 It's like, the ultimate publication, you know? They've been around for 100 years, killing it with satire and quality journalism. Marshall Curry did an amazing job researching and filming this doc, it's soooo interesting! πŸ“š I love how he got all these famous writers and editors to share their stories, it's like a masterclass on the magazine's history. And can we talk about the visuals? 😍 The cinematography is insane, it looks like a beautiful coffee table book come to life! πŸ’» But what I love most about this doc is how it shows that The New Yorker isn't just a publication, it's an institution with a community of passionate people who care deeply about its mission. ❀️ It's also super inspiring to see how they've adapted over the years and still manage to thrive. πŸ‘ Overall, if you're into publishing, journalism, or just want to learn more about The New Yorker, this doc is a MUST-SEE! πŸŽ₯
 
πŸ“° I think it's really interesting how The New Yorker has managed to stay relevant over the years despite all these changes in the media landscape. I mean, can you imagine if they'd just disappeared? It would be a huge loss for anyone who loves reading thoughtful articles and satire that actually makes you think πŸ€”.

What strikes me most about this documentary is how it highlights the passion and dedication of its writers, editors, and readers. It's clear that everyone involved in The New Yorker is driven by a desire to create something special and share their unique perspectives with others.

I also love how the film shows the inner workings of the magazine, from its rigorous fact-checking department to its commitment to quality journalism. It's impressive to see how they've managed to adapt to changing times while still staying true to their core values πŸ’Ό.

One thing that does worry me is the collective bargaining fight with Condé Nast. I hope The New Yorker can find a way to balance its desire for financial stability with its commitment to quality journalism and its unique voice 🀞.

Overall, I think this documentary series is going to be a huge hit with anyone who loves reading and learning about American culture πŸ“šπŸ’‘
 
I don’t usually comment but I just watched that new docu on The New Yorker and it’s really inspiring 🀩. I mean, who would have thought that some satirical magazine from the 1920s could become a global brand? 🌎 It’s crazy to think about how much talent is behind that iconic masthead – Julianne Moore, Jesse Eisenberg... they’re like superheroes πŸ’ͺ. And the way it talks about quality journalism, it makes you appreciate what we have here in the West more πŸ™. Sure, there are challenges and controversies, but I think the doc does a great job of showcasing the passion and dedication of its writers and editors – that sushi analogy is pretty cool πŸ˜‚. Would love to see more like this kind of documentary on other cultural institutions πŸ‘.
 
πŸ€” You can't always control what you think, but you can control what you believe 😊. The New Yorker at 100 is more than just a documentary series, it's a testament to the power of quality journalism and the dedication of its writers, editors, and readers πŸ“šπŸ’‘. As long as they stay true to their core values, I have no doubt that The New Yorker will continue to thrive in an increasingly complex media landscape πŸ’ͺ.
 
I don't get why everyone's so hyped about The New Yorker doco πŸ€”. I mean, it's just another publication trying to cling to its relevance in the digital age. And what's with all these interviews with A-list celebrities? It feels like they're more interested in promoting their own brands than giving real insight into the magazine's history. Plus, the fact that CondΓ© Nast is being portrayed as some kind of villain for not paying its writers enough is just a bunch of hooey πŸ€‘. And let's be real, 100 years is a pretty long time to have been around - it's like they're trying to make up for something by throwing money at the problem πŸ’Έ.
 
Back
Top