Mount Rushmore's Dark Legacy
Gerard Baker, now 71, still works out on his Montana ranch despite suffering from health issues. His six-year stint as the first Native American superintendent at Mount Rushmore was transformative and tumultuous. Conceived in 1925 by Gutzon Borglum, who envisioned a memorial to American political system, the monument has become a lightning rod for interpretation.
Baker's efforts to introduce Native history at Mount Rushmore were met with resistance from local groups, including the Mount Rushmore Society, which questioned his approach and style. This led to clashes and a toll on Baker's health, resulting in a stroke in 2009. Despite these challenges, Baker remained committed to telling Native American stories within the national park system.
The Black Hills, where Mount Rushmore stands, are sacred to the Lakota people, who were forcibly removed from their land in 1877 after defeating George Armstrong Custer's 7th Cavalry at Little Bighorn. The US seizure of the Paha Sapa led to a process of erasure for Native American culture and history.
Baker's approach was unprecedented, as he hired local Native American interpreters to share stories about their tribes. He also set up tipis to educate visitors and recruited hoop dancers to perform at Rushmore's auditorium to showcase Indigenous culture. This effort was a culmination of Baker's career in expanding the interpretation of national parks.
However, not everyone within the Black Hills community welcomed this expanded narrative. The memorial became a source of pain for many Native Americans, who saw it as a reflection of the US's genocidal march west that killed millions of Native people.
Today, Baker wonders if he could have been less forceful in his pursuit of change, but his legacy continues to be felt at Mount Rushmore. As the Trump administration seeks to remove historical complexity from national parks and museums, Baker's battles over interpretive soul strike a chord.
Baker's words serve as a reminder that interpretation is power: "We have to look at what do the visitors want to hear when they come to a park like Rushmore... And how do they want to leave? Well, most people want to come to a national park and leave with that warm, fuzzy feeling with an ice-cream cone. Rushmore can't do that if you do it the right way." If done correctly, interpretation can leave visitors "pissed," but also empowered with a deeper understanding of American history and culture.
The power of interpretation is what Baker fought for at Mount Rushmore, and it remains a crucial aspect of national parks and museums today.
Gerard Baker, now 71, still works out on his Montana ranch despite suffering from health issues. His six-year stint as the first Native American superintendent at Mount Rushmore was transformative and tumultuous. Conceived in 1925 by Gutzon Borglum, who envisioned a memorial to American political system, the monument has become a lightning rod for interpretation.
Baker's efforts to introduce Native history at Mount Rushmore were met with resistance from local groups, including the Mount Rushmore Society, which questioned his approach and style. This led to clashes and a toll on Baker's health, resulting in a stroke in 2009. Despite these challenges, Baker remained committed to telling Native American stories within the national park system.
The Black Hills, where Mount Rushmore stands, are sacred to the Lakota people, who were forcibly removed from their land in 1877 after defeating George Armstrong Custer's 7th Cavalry at Little Bighorn. The US seizure of the Paha Sapa led to a process of erasure for Native American culture and history.
Baker's approach was unprecedented, as he hired local Native American interpreters to share stories about their tribes. He also set up tipis to educate visitors and recruited hoop dancers to perform at Rushmore's auditorium to showcase Indigenous culture. This effort was a culmination of Baker's career in expanding the interpretation of national parks.
However, not everyone within the Black Hills community welcomed this expanded narrative. The memorial became a source of pain for many Native Americans, who saw it as a reflection of the US's genocidal march west that killed millions of Native people.
Today, Baker wonders if he could have been less forceful in his pursuit of change, but his legacy continues to be felt at Mount Rushmore. As the Trump administration seeks to remove historical complexity from national parks and museums, Baker's battles over interpretive soul strike a chord.
Baker's words serve as a reminder that interpretation is power: "We have to look at what do the visitors want to hear when they come to a park like Rushmore... And how do they want to leave? Well, most people want to come to a national park and leave with that warm, fuzzy feeling with an ice-cream cone. Rushmore can't do that if you do it the right way." If done correctly, interpretation can leave visitors "pissed," but also empowered with a deeper understanding of American history and culture.
The power of interpretation is what Baker fought for at Mount Rushmore, and it remains a crucial aspect of national parks and museums today.