I gotta say, this is a pretty wild situation 
. I mean, one minute you're banned from using an app, and the next, they're creating a whole new entity to make sure it's compliant 
. It's like they're trying to fix the problem by making another solution 
.
Personally, I think it's good that they're taking steps to address national security concerns
. But at the same time, I'm a bit worried about what this means for user data and free speech 
. If we can't even trust our own social media apps, is that really what we want? 
I do like that Oracle and other investors are taking an active role in shaping the new entity's content recommendation algorithm
. Maybe they'll be able to create a system that actually helps users rather than just serving them ads 
.
The only thing I'm not clear on is how much separation we can really expect from ByteDance
. If there's still going to be some kind of connection between the two, does that mean our data is still at risk?
. I mean, one minute you're banned from using an app, and the next, they're creating a whole new entity to make sure it's compliant . It's like they're trying to fix the problem by making another solution .Personally, I think it's good that they're taking steps to address national security concerns
. But at the same time, I'm a bit worried about what this means for user data and free speech . If we can't even trust our own social media apps, is that really what we want? I do like that Oracle and other investors are taking an active role in shaping the new entity's content recommendation algorithm
. Maybe they'll be able to create a system that actually helps users rather than just serving them ads .The only thing I'm not clear on is how much separation we can really expect from ByteDance
. If there's still going to be some kind of connection between the two, does that mean our data is still at risk?