US Justice Department Says Review of Jeffrey Epstein Case is 'Over', Critics Disagree
A senior US official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, has stated that the review of the high-profile Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking case "is over". However, many critics disagree with this assessment.
In a recent interview, Blanche claimed that victims of Epstein's alleged crimes want to be made whole and that prosecutors are committed to holding those responsible accountable. However, his comments have been met with skepticism from some lawmakers, including California Representative Ro Khanna.
Khanna accused the US Justice Department of releasing only half of the documents related to Epstein's case, despite a transparency law requiring full disclosure. He also pointed out that several prominent figures, including Elon Musk and Howard Lutnick, were mentioned in released files, sparking outrage among some lawmakers who claim these individuals had no involvement in wrongdoing.
The situation is particularly contentious given the high-profile nature of the case and the fact that Epstein was a friend of former President Donald Trump. While Blanche claims to have "nothing to hide", many lawmakers believe that the Justice Department is withholding crucial information.
In response to concerns about redacted identities, Blanche admitted that some survivors' names were accidentally released without proper editing. However, he downplayed the significance of this issue, stating it was a mere 0.001% of all released documents.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have called for full transparency and accountability in the Epstein case, with many questioning who exactly is being protected by the Justice Department's actions.
"It's not over and it will not be over until there is full and complete transparency as demanded by the survivors," declared top House Democrat Hakeem Jeffries. "There are more documents that are being withheld... The question is what they're hiding from the American people and who they're protecting."
A senior US official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, has stated that the review of the high-profile Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking case "is over". However, many critics disagree with this assessment.
In a recent interview, Blanche claimed that victims of Epstein's alleged crimes want to be made whole and that prosecutors are committed to holding those responsible accountable. However, his comments have been met with skepticism from some lawmakers, including California Representative Ro Khanna.
Khanna accused the US Justice Department of releasing only half of the documents related to Epstein's case, despite a transparency law requiring full disclosure. He also pointed out that several prominent figures, including Elon Musk and Howard Lutnick, were mentioned in released files, sparking outrage among some lawmakers who claim these individuals had no involvement in wrongdoing.
The situation is particularly contentious given the high-profile nature of the case and the fact that Epstein was a friend of former President Donald Trump. While Blanche claims to have "nothing to hide", many lawmakers believe that the Justice Department is withholding crucial information.
In response to concerns about redacted identities, Blanche admitted that some survivors' names were accidentally released without proper editing. However, he downplayed the significance of this issue, stating it was a mere 0.001% of all released documents.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have called for full transparency and accountability in the Epstein case, with many questioning who exactly is being protected by the Justice Department's actions.
"It's not over and it will not be over until there is full and complete transparency as demanded by the survivors," declared top House Democrat Hakeem Jeffries. "There are more documents that are being withheld... The question is what they're hiding from the American people and who they're protecting."