California's Law to Unmask Federal Agents Sparks Lawsuit from Trump Administration
The Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against California, claiming that the state's recent laws aimed at prohibiting federal agents from wearing facial coverings and requiring them to identify themselves during their duties are unconstitutional.
The Trump administration argues that these laws violate the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, which grants federal laws precedence over state laws. The administration also claims that the laws pose a threat to the safety and well-being of federal officers.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the No Secret Police Act into law in September, banning federal, state, and local officials from concealing their identities with face coverings while conducting operations. However, some state officials, including those in the California Highway Patrol, are exempt from this ban due to health or medical reasons.
The administration claims that California's laws discriminate against federal agents by exempting certain state officials. Newsom has criticized the lawsuit, saying that if the Trump administration cared about public safety as much as it does about pardoning cop-beaters and violating people's rights, communities would be safer.
In addition to the No Secret Police Act, Newsom also signed the No Vigilantes Act in September, requiring non-uniformed federal agents operating in California to display identification that includes their agency and a name or badge number. Both laws impose criminal penalties on federal law enforcement officers for noncompliance in some cases.
Critics of the facial covering ban argue that it puts officers' lives and well-being at risk by prohibiting them from protecting their identity when needed. The Department of Homeland Security has called Newsom's mask ban a "PR stunt" and stated that it will not comply with the law.
The lawsuit is the latest in a series of challenges to Trump-era policies by California, which has been pushing back against federal laws and regulations under Newsom's leadership.
The Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against California, claiming that the state's recent laws aimed at prohibiting federal agents from wearing facial coverings and requiring them to identify themselves during their duties are unconstitutional.
The Trump administration argues that these laws violate the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, which grants federal laws precedence over state laws. The administration also claims that the laws pose a threat to the safety and well-being of federal officers.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the No Secret Police Act into law in September, banning federal, state, and local officials from concealing their identities with face coverings while conducting operations. However, some state officials, including those in the California Highway Patrol, are exempt from this ban due to health or medical reasons.
The administration claims that California's laws discriminate against federal agents by exempting certain state officials. Newsom has criticized the lawsuit, saying that if the Trump administration cared about public safety as much as it does about pardoning cop-beaters and violating people's rights, communities would be safer.
In addition to the No Secret Police Act, Newsom also signed the No Vigilantes Act in September, requiring non-uniformed federal agents operating in California to display identification that includes their agency and a name or badge number. Both laws impose criminal penalties on federal law enforcement officers for noncompliance in some cases.
Critics of the facial covering ban argue that it puts officers' lives and well-being at risk by prohibiting them from protecting their identity when needed. The Department of Homeland Security has called Newsom's mask ban a "PR stunt" and stated that it will not comply with the law.
The lawsuit is the latest in a series of challenges to Trump-era policies by California, which has been pushing back against federal laws and regulations under Newsom's leadership.