The fragile ceasefire in Gaza, brokered by former US President Donald Trump's 20-point peace plan, is hanging by a thread. The two-year conflict has left widespread destruction and a humanitarian crisis, but a breakthrough was made when Israel and Hamas signed off on the agreement, paving the way for a ceasefire, human aid deliveries, and prisoner exchanges.
However, beneath the surface of this fragile détente lies unresolved issues that could unravel the entire peace plan. One major point of contention is Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. Despite initial pullbacks, Israel will retain control over more than half of the territory, including the Philadelphi corridor, which Hamas has insisted it must relinquish.
The lack of a specified timeline for these withdrawals and the absence of a clear enforcer raises concerns that the ceasefire could be jeopardized if Israel baulks at additional withdrawals. The White House's inability to intervene when Israel walked away from previous agreements is an ominous sign that Trump's plan relies too heavily on Israel's goodwill.
Another problem with the Trump plan is the lack of monitoring and verification provisions for Hamas's disarmament obligations. This omission could allow Israel to delay withdrawing troops by citing Hamas's non-compliance, while giving Hamas a convenient excuse to stall on disarmament. The complete lack of trust between Hamas and Israel makes these disputes almost inevitable.
The international stabilisation force (ISF) proposed in the plan is another concern. Without clear details on its size, responsibilities, and means, it remains unclear whether regional states will commit troops or if the IDF will intervene to contain disorder. This raises questions about the ISF's effectiveness and Israel's willingness to relinquish control.
Ultimately, Gaza's ceasefire may hold but its foundation is fragile. If disputes over disarmament escalate into violence, the rest of the Trump plan – including aid deliveries, peacekeeping deployments, a post-war governance structure, and economic reconstruction – will remain aspirational, while Gaza could revert to a killing field.
However, beneath the surface of this fragile détente lies unresolved issues that could unravel the entire peace plan. One major point of contention is Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. Despite initial pullbacks, Israel will retain control over more than half of the territory, including the Philadelphi corridor, which Hamas has insisted it must relinquish.
The lack of a specified timeline for these withdrawals and the absence of a clear enforcer raises concerns that the ceasefire could be jeopardized if Israel baulks at additional withdrawals. The White House's inability to intervene when Israel walked away from previous agreements is an ominous sign that Trump's plan relies too heavily on Israel's goodwill.
Another problem with the Trump plan is the lack of monitoring and verification provisions for Hamas's disarmament obligations. This omission could allow Israel to delay withdrawing troops by citing Hamas's non-compliance, while giving Hamas a convenient excuse to stall on disarmament. The complete lack of trust between Hamas and Israel makes these disputes almost inevitable.
The international stabilisation force (ISF) proposed in the plan is another concern. Without clear details on its size, responsibilities, and means, it remains unclear whether regional states will commit troops or if the IDF will intervene to contain disorder. This raises questions about the ISF's effectiveness and Israel's willingness to relinquish control.
Ultimately, Gaza's ceasefire may hold but its foundation is fragile. If disputes over disarmament escalate into violence, the rest of the Trump plan – including aid deliveries, peacekeeping deployments, a post-war governance structure, and economic reconstruction – will remain aspirational, while Gaza could revert to a killing field.