US Court Sides with Trump in Deportation Case Against Palestinian Activist
A federal appeals court has ruled that a Palestinian activist detained by US authorities last year can be deported, handing a significant victory to the administration of President Donald Trump.
Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian-born Algerian citizen who is married to a US citizen and holds lawfully permanent resident status, had challenged his detention through a habeas corpus petition. The appeals panel concluded that only immigration courts have jurisdiction over his case, effectively dismissing Khalil's claim for federal court review.
The ruling may allow for Khalil's re-arrest, as he missed the birth of his first child while detained by immigration authorities last year. However, the decision does not go into effect immediately, and Khalil has stated plans to appeal.
Critics argue that Trump's campaign to deport pro-Palestine students based on their criticism of Israel is a threat to US free speech rights and constitutional protections. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani condemned the ruling, stating that it constitutes "a chilling act of political repression" that undermines the city's constitutional rights.
Khalil's case was part of a broader effort by Trump's administration to target critics of Israel for deportation. The appeals panel's decision could set a precedent for other pro-Palestine activists facing similar challenges.
Advocates are already planning to appeal, with the New York Civil Liberties Union stating that the ruling "undermines the role federal courts must play in preventing flagrant constitutional violations." Khalil's lawyer has vowed to continue pursuing all available legal options to ensure his client's rights are protected.
A federal appeals court has ruled that a Palestinian activist detained by US authorities last year can be deported, handing a significant victory to the administration of President Donald Trump.
Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian-born Algerian citizen who is married to a US citizen and holds lawfully permanent resident status, had challenged his detention through a habeas corpus petition. The appeals panel concluded that only immigration courts have jurisdiction over his case, effectively dismissing Khalil's claim for federal court review.
The ruling may allow for Khalil's re-arrest, as he missed the birth of his first child while detained by immigration authorities last year. However, the decision does not go into effect immediately, and Khalil has stated plans to appeal.
Critics argue that Trump's campaign to deport pro-Palestine students based on their criticism of Israel is a threat to US free speech rights and constitutional protections. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani condemned the ruling, stating that it constitutes "a chilling act of political repression" that undermines the city's constitutional rights.
Khalil's case was part of a broader effort by Trump's administration to target critics of Israel for deportation. The appeals panel's decision could set a precedent for other pro-Palestine activists facing similar challenges.
Advocates are already planning to appeal, with the New York Civil Liberties Union stating that the ruling "undermines the role federal courts must play in preventing flagrant constitutional violations." Khalil's lawyer has vowed to continue pursuing all available legal options to ensure his client's rights are protected.