Feds' Largest Minnesota Fraud Case Left High-Profile Prosecutors in a Hurry to Get Out
The US Attorney's Office for the District of Minnesota is grappling with a major crisis after four top prosecutors, who spearheaded the $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud case, suddenly quit. The exodus has left the office severely depleted, with only 17 assistant US attorneys remaining - down from 70 during the Biden administration.
Former prosecutors Joe Thompson, Harry Jacobs, Daniel Bobier, and Matthew Ebert have handed off their cases to relative newcomers in a bid to escape what sources describe as "caseload management hell" and "structural issues within the office." The reasons behind the mass exodus are not entirely clear, but insiders point to factors including Trump-era influence, Operation Metro Surge, and concerns about the office's ability to manage its workload.
The departures come at a critical time for the case, with the final trial set to begin in April. Two new prosecutors, Rebecca Kline and Matthew Murphy, have taken over leading the case against eight defendants accused of defrauding Medicaid programs, including former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman's husband Mark Vance Boelter.
Stacey Young, founder of Justice Connection, a Washington D.C.-based organization of former Justice Department employees, warned that "the loss of institutional knowledge and expertise will destabilize the US Attorney's office, leaving Minnesotans' safety and rights less protected." The situation has raised concerns about the ability of federal prosecutors to effectively investigate and prosecute complex cases like Minnesota's massive COVID-era fraud scandal.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department is scrambling to recruit new prosecutors from neighboring districts. A DHS attorney working in Minnesota was removed from her assignment after admitting that "this job sucks" and asked to be held in contempt for wanting a full night's sleep. The department has promised to bolster its ranks with prosecutors from other jurisdictions, but it remains unclear whether this will solve the crisis.
In total, federal prosecutors have convicted 62 people in connection with Minnesota's scandal, which is estimated to have cost taxpayers over $1 billion.
The US Attorney's Office for the District of Minnesota is grappling with a major crisis after four top prosecutors, who spearheaded the $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud case, suddenly quit. The exodus has left the office severely depleted, with only 17 assistant US attorneys remaining - down from 70 during the Biden administration.
Former prosecutors Joe Thompson, Harry Jacobs, Daniel Bobier, and Matthew Ebert have handed off their cases to relative newcomers in a bid to escape what sources describe as "caseload management hell" and "structural issues within the office." The reasons behind the mass exodus are not entirely clear, but insiders point to factors including Trump-era influence, Operation Metro Surge, and concerns about the office's ability to manage its workload.
The departures come at a critical time for the case, with the final trial set to begin in April. Two new prosecutors, Rebecca Kline and Matthew Murphy, have taken over leading the case against eight defendants accused of defrauding Medicaid programs, including former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman's husband Mark Vance Boelter.
Stacey Young, founder of Justice Connection, a Washington D.C.-based organization of former Justice Department employees, warned that "the loss of institutional knowledge and expertise will destabilize the US Attorney's office, leaving Minnesotans' safety and rights less protected." The situation has raised concerns about the ability of federal prosecutors to effectively investigate and prosecute complex cases like Minnesota's massive COVID-era fraud scandal.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department is scrambling to recruit new prosecutors from neighboring districts. A DHS attorney working in Minnesota was removed from her assignment after admitting that "this job sucks" and asked to be held in contempt for wanting a full night's sleep. The department has promised to bolster its ranks with prosecutors from other jurisdictions, but it remains unclear whether this will solve the crisis.
In total, federal prosecutors have convicted 62 people in connection with Minnesota's scandal, which is estimated to have cost taxpayers over $1 billion.
... it sounds like a complete mess! all of a sudden, top prosecutors are ghosting their own cases & leaving the office severely depleted? 
that's not exactly what u wanna see when it comes to the justice system. i mean, i get it, workload management can be tough, but 4 high-profile prosecutors just up & quitting at the same time? 
sounds like there's more to it than meets the eye. & now they're scrambling 2 recruit new prosecutors from neighboring districts... that's just gonna take time 
... hope they get their act together before the final trial in april 
... Feds are already struggling to keep up with investigations and now they're losing top talent left and right? It's like they're trying to put out a fire but adding fuel to the flames instead of water 
. I mean, who wants to work in "caseload management hell" or deal with "structural issues within the office"? Not me, that's for sure 
. And now they're scrambling to recruit new prosecutors from neighboring districts? It's like they're playing catch-up 
. The fact that 4 top prosecutors just bailed on a $250 million case is crazy talk 
... what's the point of even having a team if people are just going to abandon ship? 
. It's crazy to think that only 17 AUSAs are left now - where did all those go? 
And what's with the 'caseload management hell' and 'structural issues'? 
. We need strong prosecution to bring justice to the victims of this massive $250m Feeding Our Future scam 
. The fact that we're struggling to find enough experienced prosecutors to take on high-profile cases raises red flags about our federal prosecutors' ability to handle complex cases 
.
!
or maybe they just wanted a full night's sleep lol who wouldn't want that? 
anyway this is super bad news for minnesota because now the office is way understaffed with only 17 prosecutors left 
i hope they can find some new people to take over the cases but u never know how it's all gonna play out 
and now they're having to recruit from other districts, like, what if it takes forever? 
poor minnesotans... they deserve better! 
. But at what cost? The loss of institutional knowledge and expertise is a huge concern, especially with the final trial looming in April 
. Can't say I'm confident in their ability to get the job done 
that sounds like a major excuse to me... I mean, I get it if you're feeling overwhelmed but to all abandon ship at the same time? 
. Can't these prosecutors just suck it up and deal with the workload? Or what about Operation Metro Surge, does that sound like something that would really cause people to leave their jobs? 
that can't be good for the whole office... I mean we've got only 17 left now, which is crazy low... 70 used to work there! 
it's like they're trying to just pawn off their cases to some newbies and hope for the best... 
I don't know if that's a good thing or not...
in my head about how this is all connected... it looks like a big mess, but maybe they can sort it out eventually? 
what if the new prosecutors aren't as good as the old ones? 
like how are they gonna handle the Feeding Our Future case now that 4 top prosecutors just quit?!? 
can't believe the fed's biggest case just got abandoned like that. I mean, you'd think they'd want to see some justice served for all those people who got scammed out of millions. And now they're scrambling to find new prosecutors? Like, how long is it gonna take for them to fill these spots? and what about the cases that are already on hold? it's just a mess 
. it's like they expected the whole office to be dissolved overnight just 'cause some big names left. i mean we've all been there with our job, when you leave your old colleagues behind but they don't know how to keep up... sounds like a recipe for disaster 
and now they have to find new ones? that's just crazy 
. Can't help but wonder if there's more to it than just "structural issues within the office". Don't get me wrong, workload management is important, but can't they just make a plan or something? 
... Just saying, I'd want to make sure whoever takes over the case has a solid grasp on things before moving forward 
. I mean, who wouldn't want to leave when you're dealing with "caseload management hell" and "structural issues"? It's like the system is just too broken for them to handle 
.
.