In a bold move, former FBI Director James Comey is seeking to dismiss his ongoing criminal case, alleging that the prosecution against him was motivated by "vindictive and selective" behavior from President Donald Trump. His lawyers argue that the appointment of Lindsey Halligan as the acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, where Comey's case is being heard, was unlawful and that this appointee's involvement in the indictment constitutes a fundamental constitutional defect.
In essence, Comey's defense team claims that Trump directly ordered the Department of Justice to prosecute him due to personal animosity towards him and because of his frequent criticism of the president. They have submitted detailed timelines and evidence, primarily from Trump's own statements and admissions by administration officials, to demonstrate this point.
The burden for Comey's lawyers is high in proving that the prosecution was not merely selective but also acted with genuine animus. However, they believe they have sufficient grounds for their claim, including testimony and evidence suggesting Trump's personal vendetta against Comey as the driving force behind the investigation.
This development comes at a critical juncture in the case, which emerged as a contentious issue between Trump and his onetime FBI Director. The outcome of this motion could significantly impact the future of the case, potentially leading to its dismissal with prejudice or granting Comey additional discovery and an evidentiary hearing to further scrutinize the government's actions.
The Justice Department has yet to respond to Fox News's requests for comment, leaving many questions unanswered about the next steps in the case. With a November 3 deadline approaching for the department's response, it remains to be seen how this court filing will unfold and its potential impact on the investigation against Comey.
In essence, Comey's defense team claims that Trump directly ordered the Department of Justice to prosecute him due to personal animosity towards him and because of his frequent criticism of the president. They have submitted detailed timelines and evidence, primarily from Trump's own statements and admissions by administration officials, to demonstrate this point.
The burden for Comey's lawyers is high in proving that the prosecution was not merely selective but also acted with genuine animus. However, they believe they have sufficient grounds for their claim, including testimony and evidence suggesting Trump's personal vendetta against Comey as the driving force behind the investigation.
This development comes at a critical juncture in the case, which emerged as a contentious issue between Trump and his onetime FBI Director. The outcome of this motion could significantly impact the future of the case, potentially leading to its dismissal with prejudice or granting Comey additional discovery and an evidentiary hearing to further scrutinize the government's actions.
The Justice Department has yet to respond to Fox News's requests for comment, leaving many questions unanswered about the next steps in the case. With a November 3 deadline approaching for the department's response, it remains to be seen how this court filing will unfold and its potential impact on the investigation against Comey.
Comey's defense team is trying to spin this whole thing to make it seem like Trump was behind the prosecution all along... but I'm not buying it. I mean, if that were really true, wouldn't we've seen some proof by now? The fact that they're still trying to argue for a dismissal with prejudice just because of a perceived vendetta is pretty shaky ground in my opinion... seems like they're grasping at straws here 
.
like he got railroaded by trump and now he's fighting back with all he's got. I get why some ppl might say he was too aggressive in his questioning of trump but come on, the guy was doing his job! his lawyers are really going to dig deep and find evidence of this vendetta claim... it's gonna be wild 
i'm rooting for comey here
anyway i hope he actually has some solid evidence because if not it's gonna be a long road for him and his lawyers 
. The timeline of events they're presenting looks pretty suspicious, especially with all these statements and admissions from Trump's own people. It's gonna be tough for the prosecutors to prove that it wasn't just a case of selective prosecution, but if they can get that evidence to hold up... it could really mess with their credibility 
. And I'm curious to see how this plays out in court 
. I mean, what's good about appointing someone as acting US Attorney who's allegedly got an axe to grind against Comey? It's just more dirty tricks from the Trump camp 
.
. The stakes are high, and this case has all the hallmarks of a classic Trump meltdown 
. We need to see some real accountability on Trump's part if he wants to prove that his involvement in Comey's prosecution was just about "vindictive behavior". Otherwise, we'll be left wondering if justice is even for sale anymore 
frustrating, you know? like comey gets fired from his job and suddenly he's being prosecuted 
? it seems fishy to me 
. i mean, trump's got a history of 
taking out people who get in his way, and now he's claiming 
vindictive behavior? 
process... 
. The prosecution was clearly going to happen because Comey was getting too close to some shady stuff, and now he's trying to deflect the attention onto Trump 
. Still, the burden is high, and it'll be interesting to see how this plays out. One thing's for sure - if Trump did order the DOJ to prosecute Comey, that's a whole different ball game. Could lead to some big-time fallout for the President himself...
.
And what about all the other people who got fired or fired for speaking out against Trump? Is he trying to say that they're all just being vindictive too? 
. Will they try to deny everything and call Comey out as a liar? Or will they actually try to address the allegations and show that they're being fair and impartial? 
. And for Comey's lawyers to submit all these timelines and evidence from Trump's own statements... it's like they're saying "look at this guy's Twitter feed" 
. I'm curious to see how the court responds to this motion. Is it possible that the prosecution was motivated by Trump's personal feelings? Or is it just politics as usual? 
One thing's for sure, this case has become a wild ride 
.
. If he really did order the DOJ to go after Comey because of their beef, that's a big deal 
, but this time it's Comey's lawyer doing it 
. If the government can prove that Trump was behind Comey's indictment, that could be a major blow to his presidency 
.
AND HE'S GOT THE TIMELINES AND EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP!!! IT'S LIKE, IF TRUMP REALLY DID ORDER THE DOJ TO PROSECUTE HIM THAT WOULD BE SO BAD FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND LIKE, WHOA! 