New York Attorney General Letitia James is making a desperate bid to have her mortgage fraud charges dropped, alleging that the Trump administration's actions are nothing short of "outrageous government conduct". In a 22-page filing, James' lawyers claim that the charges against her were brought about by a months-long campaign of intimidation and harassment by top officials at the Fair Housing Finance Authority (FHFA) and the Justice Department.
According to James' lawyers, FHFA Director Bill Pulte, who oversaw the investigation into James, acted with "illegality and a disregard for the law", using his position to target her in a clear bid to punish her for opposing President Trump. They point to messages between Fannie Mae officials that suggest the case against James is not strong enough, and claim that Pulte's actions were driven by a personal animus towards the Attorney General.
The investigation began after Pulte referred James for prosecution, citing several instances of alleged mortgage fraud - but James' lawyers argue that these claims are "patently unconstitutional" and intended to intimidate her. They also claim that Pulte's appointment as chairman of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is itself a breach of regulations.
In addition to targeting Pulte, James' lawyers have also singled out Ed Martin, the U.S. Pardon Attorney, for criticism. In August, Martin sent a letter to James' office urging her to resign from office, which James' lawyers claim was an attempt to intimidate her and bring about a "vindictive prosecution".
The latest development in this saga comes as Lindsey Halligan, the interim U.S. Attorney leading the investigation into James, is herself facing scrutiny over her appointment to the post. James' lawyers argue that Halligan's appointment is unlawful and that she should be disqualified from overseeing the case against their client.
At the heart of this controversy is a long-running feud between Letitia James and President Trump, who has repeatedly attacked her and called for her prosecution. In 2022, James sued Trump and his company over allegations of fraud, which a judge ultimately ruled in her favour - but not before Trump's team was ordered to pay more than $350 million in damages.
As the case against James continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether she will ultimately face conviction or if the charges will be dropped in light of these new allegations of "outrageous government conduct".
According to James' lawyers, FHFA Director Bill Pulte, who oversaw the investigation into James, acted with "illegality and a disregard for the law", using his position to target her in a clear bid to punish her for opposing President Trump. They point to messages between Fannie Mae officials that suggest the case against James is not strong enough, and claim that Pulte's actions were driven by a personal animus towards the Attorney General.
The investigation began after Pulte referred James for prosecution, citing several instances of alleged mortgage fraud - but James' lawyers argue that these claims are "patently unconstitutional" and intended to intimidate her. They also claim that Pulte's appointment as chairman of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is itself a breach of regulations.
In addition to targeting Pulte, James' lawyers have also singled out Ed Martin, the U.S. Pardon Attorney, for criticism. In August, Martin sent a letter to James' office urging her to resign from office, which James' lawyers claim was an attempt to intimidate her and bring about a "vindictive prosecution".
The latest development in this saga comes as Lindsey Halligan, the interim U.S. Attorney leading the investigation into James, is herself facing scrutiny over her appointment to the post. James' lawyers argue that Halligan's appointment is unlawful and that she should be disqualified from overseeing the case against their client.
At the heart of this controversy is a long-running feud between Letitia James and President Trump, who has repeatedly attacked her and called for her prosecution. In 2022, James sued Trump and his company over allegations of fraud, which a judge ultimately ruled in her favour - but not before Trump's team was ordered to pay more than $350 million in damages.
As the case against James continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether she will ultimately face conviction or if the charges will be dropped in light of these new allegations of "outrageous government conduct".