DataDolphin
Well-known member
TV Shows Like Stranger Things Have Become Bloated: Why 'One-and-Done' Series Are the Way Forward.
For many viewers, the start of a TV show's second season can be an exciting prospect. The finale has ended, and fans are eager to find out what happens next. But what if the first season was perfect just as it is? What if there's no need for more? This sentiment is increasingly resonating with audiences.
Take Yellowjackets, a horror-mystery series that aired its 10 episodes in season one. Fans praised the show's creative premise and strong performances from its cast members. Yet, instead of ending on a high note, the showrunners decided to extend the story for an additional two seasons. The latest announcement that season four will be the final installment has left some fans feeling relieved.
Yellowjackets is not alone in this phenomenon. Shows like Emily in Paris, House of the Dragon, and Squid Game have fallen into the trap of relying on artificial intelligence to replace their human writers. The result is a lack of cohesion and character development that's disappointing to viewers who invested time and emotions in the story.
One of the main reasons these shows have become bloated is due to overcomplication. Instead of focusing on the core characters, they introduce new ones that serve no purpose other than to pad out the narrative. It's frustrating for fans who want to see their favorite show evolve organically, rather than having it hijacked by convenient plot devices.
The problem is not unique to TV shows. In music and film, some creators feel the need to extend their work beyond its natural conclusion. This can lead to diminishing returns, as seen with some limited series that continue for seasons more due to commercial pressure than artistic merit.
There's a growing trend towards "one-and-done" series, where creators know when to stop telling a story. From Sharp Objects to Adolescence, TV shows have successfully wrapped up their narrative threads without resorting to artificial extensions. By recognizing when a show has reached its endpoint, creators can preserve the emotional impact of their work and avoid overstretching it.
For fans like me, who've invested deeply in their favorite shows, this means experiencing a more satisfying conclusion. Shows like My So-Called Life, which aired only one season but had a lasting impact on viewers, are the perfect example. Its abrupt end was heart-wrenching, yet authentic to the narrative's emotional tone.
By taking a page from these successful creators, TV producers can reconnect with their audience and deliver more meaningful storytelling experiences. It's time for shows like Yellowjackets and its fellow bloated series to take note: sometimes less is more.
For many viewers, the start of a TV show's second season can be an exciting prospect. The finale has ended, and fans are eager to find out what happens next. But what if the first season was perfect just as it is? What if there's no need for more? This sentiment is increasingly resonating with audiences.
Take Yellowjackets, a horror-mystery series that aired its 10 episodes in season one. Fans praised the show's creative premise and strong performances from its cast members. Yet, instead of ending on a high note, the showrunners decided to extend the story for an additional two seasons. The latest announcement that season four will be the final installment has left some fans feeling relieved.
Yellowjackets is not alone in this phenomenon. Shows like Emily in Paris, House of the Dragon, and Squid Game have fallen into the trap of relying on artificial intelligence to replace their human writers. The result is a lack of cohesion and character development that's disappointing to viewers who invested time and emotions in the story.
One of the main reasons these shows have become bloated is due to overcomplication. Instead of focusing on the core characters, they introduce new ones that serve no purpose other than to pad out the narrative. It's frustrating for fans who want to see their favorite show evolve organically, rather than having it hijacked by convenient plot devices.
The problem is not unique to TV shows. In music and film, some creators feel the need to extend their work beyond its natural conclusion. This can lead to diminishing returns, as seen with some limited series that continue for seasons more due to commercial pressure than artistic merit.
There's a growing trend towards "one-and-done" series, where creators know when to stop telling a story. From Sharp Objects to Adolescence, TV shows have successfully wrapped up their narrative threads without resorting to artificial extensions. By recognizing when a show has reached its endpoint, creators can preserve the emotional impact of their work and avoid overstretching it.
For fans like me, who've invested deeply in their favorite shows, this means experiencing a more satisfying conclusion. Shows like My So-Called Life, which aired only one season but had a lasting impact on viewers, are the perfect example. Its abrupt end was heart-wrenching, yet authentic to the narrative's emotional tone.
By taking a page from these successful creators, TV producers can reconnect with their audience and deliver more meaningful storytelling experiences. It's time for shows like Yellowjackets and its fellow bloated series to take note: sometimes less is more.