The global beauty industry, worth a staggering $500 billion, has made significant promises to reduce its environmental impact. However, the efforts so far are often piecemeal and lacking in consistency. Sustainability challenges persist across product manufacturing, packaging, and disposal.
According to research firm Simon Kucher's Global Sustainability Study 2021, consumers increasingly prioritize sustainability when making purchasing decisions. Sixty percent of respondents worldwide rate sustainability as an important purchase criterion, with a third willing to pay more for sustainable products or services.
This shift in consumer behavior has pushed many beauty brands to set ambitious environmental goals, including phasing out single-use plastics and reducing packaging waste. However, consumers often struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of products due to inconsistent industry efforts and a lack of transparency around ingredients and manufacturing processes.
The term "clean beauty" is often misused by brands, with some using it as a marketing gimmick despite not necessarily adhering to sustainable practices. The British Beauty Council CEO Millie Kendall argues that such buzzwords are losing traction among consumers, who demand better information and certification.
In reality, the industry's sustainability challenges run deep. Plastic packaging, in particular, is a significant problem, with 95% of the industry's waste being thrown away and mostly not recyclable. Major brands like L'Oréal and Estee Lauder have set targets to increase post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic usage but are far from meeting them.
Governments and multinationals can play a crucial role in enforcing regulations and setting standards for sustainability claims, but the industry is largely relying on self-regulation. The lack of standardization and transparency makes it difficult for consumers to make informed purchasing decisions.
In the US, for example, the European Union has stricter guidelines on cosmetic ingredients, with 2,495 substances banned from use in products marketed for sale or use within the bloc. In contrast, the FDA only lists 11 such substances. This disparity highlights the need for greater regulation and standardization across the industry.
Ultimately, sustainability change will come through market leadership and consumer advocacy. As Mia Davis of beauty retailer Credo Beauty notes, "Regulation can raise the floor a bit, but that's never going to be what the market can do." The industry must take bold action to address its climate shortcomings, and consumers must demand more from brands.
According to research firm Simon Kucher's Global Sustainability Study 2021, consumers increasingly prioritize sustainability when making purchasing decisions. Sixty percent of respondents worldwide rate sustainability as an important purchase criterion, with a third willing to pay more for sustainable products or services.
This shift in consumer behavior has pushed many beauty brands to set ambitious environmental goals, including phasing out single-use plastics and reducing packaging waste. However, consumers often struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of products due to inconsistent industry efforts and a lack of transparency around ingredients and manufacturing processes.
The term "clean beauty" is often misused by brands, with some using it as a marketing gimmick despite not necessarily adhering to sustainable practices. The British Beauty Council CEO Millie Kendall argues that such buzzwords are losing traction among consumers, who demand better information and certification.
In reality, the industry's sustainability challenges run deep. Plastic packaging, in particular, is a significant problem, with 95% of the industry's waste being thrown away and mostly not recyclable. Major brands like L'Oréal and Estee Lauder have set targets to increase post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic usage but are far from meeting them.
Governments and multinationals can play a crucial role in enforcing regulations and setting standards for sustainability claims, but the industry is largely relying on self-regulation. The lack of standardization and transparency makes it difficult for consumers to make informed purchasing decisions.
In the US, for example, the European Union has stricter guidelines on cosmetic ingredients, with 2,495 substances banned from use in products marketed for sale or use within the bloc. In contrast, the FDA only lists 11 such substances. This disparity highlights the need for greater regulation and standardization across the industry.
Ultimately, sustainability change will come through market leadership and consumer advocacy. As Mia Davis of beauty retailer Credo Beauty notes, "Regulation can raise the floor a bit, but that's never going to be what the market can do." The industry must take bold action to address its climate shortcomings, and consumers must demand more from brands.
. It's like, what's the point of that? Can't they just give you actual money instead? Anyway, back to beauty industry... I mean, it's crazy how much plastic packaging is wasted in this industry. Like, can't we just use biodegradable stuff or something? And don't even get me started on the "clean beauty" labels... it sounds like a bunch of marketing nonsense to me 
. I guess what they need is some real transparency and regulation... but yeah, market leadership and consumer advocacy are key, right? 
. Yeah sure, they're talking the talk but when it comes down to it, their actions (or lack thereof) scream otherwise 
. 500 billion dollars is a pretty penny for an industry that's still riddled with waste and plastic pollution 
. Consumers need more than just buzzwords like "clean beauty" to make them feel good about buying products 
. We need concrete changes, real transparency, and some serious regulation 
. The FDA's guidelines are laughable compared to the EU's - something needs to change ASAP 
. Until then, I'll be holding my beauty purchases for ransom, demanding proof of sustainability from brands 
.
. To create real change, there needs to be more standardization and transparency around ingredients, manufacturing processes, and packaging waste. The fact that only 3% of the industry's plastic waste is recyclable is alarming 
. If governments and multinationals don't step in to enforce stricter regulations, it's up to consumers to hold brands accountable by making informed purchasing decisions 
. Ultimately, market leadership and consumer advocacy are key drivers of sustainability change 
.
. Seriously though, it's crazy that only 5% of plastic waste from the beauty industry is recyclable...that's just sad 
. Brands need to step up their game and make sustainability a priority if they want to keep up with consumers who are actually looking out for the planet 
.
. Brands should be transparent about their ingredients and processes, you know? Like, if they're not recyclable, that's just not cool 
. And 95% of the industry's waste being thrown away is wild... can't we do better than that? 
. Consumers are getting smarter about sustainability and they won't settle for anything less 
. We need more accountability, not just empty buzzwords 
.
. It feels like some brands are just slapping a sticker on their packaging and calling it a day 
. I mean, what's the point of even having sustainability goals if we can't trust them to follow through? 
. I mean, 60% of consumers care about sustainability? That's awesome, but what's actually being done to back it up? Brands are just slapping "clean" labels on their products without any real substance behind it 
.
. And let's be real, consumers need more info on what they're actually buying - we can't trust that every "natural" product is actually natural 
!
, and it's super frustrating for consumers who want actual transparency about the ingredients and manufacturing processes.
But until we see more consistency across the industry, it's hard to trust what companies are saying. And let's be real, plastic packaging is a HUGE problem 
.
I'm so over these companies using the term 'clean beauty' like it means they're doing better than everyone else just because they use a few eco-friendly ingredients 
Newsflash: it's not that simple! The industry as a whole needs to step up its game and provide more transparency around their manufacturing processes. I mean, 95% of plastic waste isn't recyclable? That's crazy! 
We need stricter regulations and standards for sustainability claims, like the EU has with cosmetic ingredients. It's time for brands to take bold action and consumers to demand better from them 
[GIF of a person shrugging]
They need to step up their game and set some actual goals for reducing packaging waste and using eco-friendly materials 
.
. We need to hold them accountable for their sustainability claims and push them towards real change 
. The industry needs to take bold action and set some actual standards, not just talk the talk 
.
...
It looks like there's a hidden agenda at play here, somethin' that's benefitting certain big players in the industry. I'm not sayin' it's necessarily true, but I'm definitely keepin' an eye on this one 